ABSTRACT
Background@#Although recent evidence supports that prolonged sedentary behavior and reduced physical activity are associated with colorectal cancer risk, there are few studies analyzing the colorectal cancer risk according to different types of physical activity and combined effects of sedentary behavior and physical activity on colorectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the association of sedentary behavior and physical activity with colorectal cancer. @*Methods@#A cross-sectional study included a total of 33,403 participants from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2014 to 2019. Sedentary behavior was dichotomized into < 10 hr/day and ≥ 10 hr/day, and three types of physical activity were investigated, including leisure-time, occupational, and transportation physical activity. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to sedentary behavior and physical activity. @*Results@#Sedentary behavior was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.21), while the different domains of physical activity were not significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk. In a combined analysis, those with sedentary behavior and without physical activity showed an increased risk of colorectal cancer compared to that of the reference category without sedentary behavior and with physical activity (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02–2.16). @*Conclusion@#This study found that sedentary behavior was significantly associated with the increased risk of colorectal cancer. Moreover, sedentary behavior without physical activity increased the risk of colorectal cancer. Reducing sedentary behavior and recommending any type of physical activity may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer.
ABSTRACT
We aimed to review whether pretreatment inflammatory markers reflect the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colon cancer, rectal cancer, colon and rectal cancers, and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We found that pretreatment complete blood count and blood chemistry tests reflect short-term and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with CRC. Specifically, in patients with colon cancer, hypoalbuminemia was associated with worse postoperative morbidity, mortality, and inferior survival. In patients with rectal cancer, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocytosis were associated with postoperative complications, poor overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A high C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) was associated with poor OS and DFS. In patients with metastatic CRC, increased NLR and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with poor OS, DFS, and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, high CAR and a low albumin/globulin ratio on blood chemistry tests were associated with poor OS and PFS. Although universal cut-off values were not available, various types of pretreatment laboratory markers could be utilized as adjuncts to predict prognosis in patients with CRC.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Traumatic kidney injury can be treated surgically or nonsurgically. Nonsurgical treatment options include angiography, embolization, and conservative treatment. We aimed to identify factors that help in making clinical decisions on treatment plans for patients with traumatic kidney injury caused by blunt trauma. @*Methods@#The study included 377 patients aged ≥18 years with traumatic kidney injury caused by blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the emergency room of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital between January 2008 and July 2020. Medical records, laboratory test results, and computed tomography results were retrospectively reviewed. @*Results@#Multivariable logistic analysis showed diastolic blood pressure at admission and disruption of Gerota's fascia were significantly associated with surgical treatment, and that perinephric hematoma rim distance was the only significant indicator favoring embolization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that angiography and embolization should be considered when hematoma size exceeds 2.97 cm. @*Conclusion@#When a patient with traumatic kidney injury due to blunt trauma visits an emergency room, even when vital signs are stable, Gerota’s fascia should be checked by computed tomography prior to deciding on surgical treatment, and angiographic embolization should be considered if perinephric hematoma rim distance exceeds 2.97 cm.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Traumatic kidney injury can be treated surgically or nonsurgically. Nonsurgical treatment options include angiography, embolization, and conservative treatment. We aimed to identify factors that help in making clinical decisions on treatment plans for patients with traumatic kidney injury caused by blunt trauma. @*Methods@#The study included 377 patients aged ≥18 years with traumatic kidney injury caused by blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the emergency room of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital between January 2008 and July 2020. Medical records, laboratory test results, and computed tomography results were retrospectively reviewed. @*Results@#Multivariable logistic analysis showed diastolic blood pressure at admission and disruption of Gerota's fascia were significantly associated with surgical treatment, and that perinephric hematoma rim distance was the only significant indicator favoring embolization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that angiography and embolization should be considered when hematoma size exceeds 2.97 cm. @*Conclusion@#When a patient with traumatic kidney injury due to blunt trauma visits an emergency room, even when vital signs are stable, Gerota’s fascia should be checked by computed tomography prior to deciding on surgical treatment, and angiographic embolization should be considered if perinephric hematoma rim distance exceeds 2.97 cm.
ABSTRACT
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) refers to a disturbance of bowel function that commonly manifests within 1 month after rectal cancer surgery. A low level of anastomosis and chemoradiotherapy have been consistently found to be risk factors for developing LARS. Thorough history taking and physical examination with adjunctive procedures are essential when evaluating patients with LARS. Anorectal manometry, fecoflowmetry, and validated questionnaires are important tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with LARS. Conservative management (medical, physiotherapy, transanal irrigation), invasive procedures (neuromodulation), and multimodal therapy are the mainstay of treatment for patients with LARS. A stoma could be considered when other treatment modalities have failed. An initial meticulous surgical procedure for rectal cancer, creation of a neorectal reservoir during anastomosis, and proper exercise of the anal sphincter muscle (Kegel’s maneuver) are essential to combat LARS. Pretreatment counseling is a crucial step for patients who have risk factors for developing LARS.